Re-framing the "mess", valuing play

Tag: play residue

Unsettled

Play can have a surprising way of unfolding. We may think we know how children will use a space or the materials within it, however I am often amazed at where children’s creativity will lead them. Recently, I have also been thinking about what would have happened if I had not interrupted children’s play. Sometimes I want to comment, take a photograph, or interject in some way. Sometimes it feels necessary, such as to help problem solve.  There are two dilemmas I see here.

1)How can I be more intentional with my interruptions and keep them to a minimum.

2)Learning to trust more (the child/ren) and employing that power of pause.

These two questions can be applied to many different scenarios though my focus here is on child-material encounters.

I would like to focus on those unsettling moments , where children are starting to paint their arms or face with paint, piling all the toys and loose parts into an elaborate sculpture minutes before “clean-up” time, or using paint to make a piece of art … with the wooden unit blocks! I think about these moments because they were scenarios where I jumped right in I didn’t pause to reflect. Just a halting STOP! Though I may not have used those words my body language and conversations with the children definitely shut down the play and any chance of connecting with the children in these moments.

The day a box of new markers were used for making potions (oops). What wasn’t used was quietly put away and warn out markers were provided instead.

 

Moon Party. I only witnessed the end part of this project. This was taken over a year ago. At the time I felt unsettled by the “mess.” When i look at this photo now, I remember the joy the children had building this and the pride, as they told me all about the party.

Standing back, and letting it all unfold. While I was interested to know the story of this play, I watched from a distance, until I was invited in. I have learned sometimes we need to just get out of the way and let play happen 🙂

 

 

As I was reading an article for my Qualitative Methodologies class on the Mosaic Approach, there was a quote that connected with this post. While this article focuses on research, I think it can be argued that as Early Childhood Educators, we are definitely researchers in our own way.

One of the challenges in allowing a shift in relationships is accepting the place of the unexpected. In research terms, this may mean being relaxed about the focus of the study and not worrying if children lead the study into unplanned areas …. The advantages of accepting a shifting in power are a release from the need for adults to ‘know all the answers’ (Clark 2005, p.25-26).

 

How do developmental checklists, school readiness, the clock, the daily “schedule,” our own agenda, our “planned” activity, worries about mess, noise, and other peoples perceptions of us get in the way of the unexpected?

How do you navigate that delicate dance?

References

Clark, A. (2005) ‘Ways of seeing: using the Mosaic approach to listen to young children’s per-spectives’, in Clark, A., Kjørholt and Moss, P. (eds.) Beyond Listening. Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 29-49). Bristol: Policy Press.

 

Snow – holding traces otherwise unseen

My winter holidays were extended by another day as St. John’s was covered in a glorious (though massive) blanket of snow. I was grateful, it gave me one more day to prepare myself for “schedules” and not being able to nap when I felt like it. it also gave me more time to read, reflect and write. I have spent the past few weeks consumed by Journeys: Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Practices through Pedagogical Narration By Veronica Pacini-Ketchabow, Filke Nxumalo, Laurie Kocher, Enid Elliot, and Alejandra Sanchez.

The Image [of the child] that educators hold is not a fixed essence, but is always shifting, always in the process of becoming – and it does so through the materials and discursive effects that educators materialize in the moments of pedagogical encounters (p.53)… They [the educators,] are part of the image- and of an ongoing articulation of the image of children in the moments of practice (p.54).

This quote struck me, and I returned to it this week as I “tidied” the environment after our Saturday group were picked up. As I stood overlooking the space that had been scattered with children just a few moments before, I thought back to the morning when this fresh layer of snow was mostly smooth and untouched, except for the prints from my snowshoes and a rabbit. Now the area was rugged looking, foot prints, deep impressions, trenches dug, snow stacked, areas slick and smooth from belly sliding.

Even after the materials had been brought back inside and place in their “place,” the traces of the children (and educators) play were left behind in the snow. While materials left behind were minimal – a few shovels, metal bowls and scoops, and a pair of mittens. The traces left behind in the snow were a powerful mapping of the mornings play.

It was somewhat of an epiphany. When I first started to think about creating this blog I started, I imagined posting photos filled with loose parts, puddles of paint, muddy tools and toys – materials arranged like a piece of abstract art.

“Traces of Play in the Snow” – Edited to emphasize the transformation of the snow

Sometimes play is minimal, with hardly any trace at all, and yet it is just as rich, just as imaginative, just as full of joy, collaboration, problem solving, and adventure as the messy and material rich play.

“Traces of Play in the Snow” – Original

Something magical, special, and important happened here^.

References

 

Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Nxumalo, F., 1971, Kocher, L., 1959, Elliot, E., 1947, & Sanchez, A., 1967. (2015). Journeys: Reconceptualizing early childhood practices through pedagogical narration. North York, Ontario: University of Toronto Press

 

 

Choosing to choose what they choose to choose (Introduction)

 

What happens when children can take the lead of their play? Choosing where to play, when to play, when to stop. Choosing to choose what they choose to choose!

The adults? They are still present, on the cusp of the play. Available, as needed. Intentionally yo-yoing in and out. Stepping back, and allowing the play to unfold.
At the end of the day, once the children have left .. what is left behind?

Traces that someone has been here, outside – impressions in the mud from boots; strings and ropes hanging, dangling, connecting, buckets, pylons, sticks collected in a neat pile, stones layed unnaturally – a path? Could it be fairies?

Inside – blocks stacked, tipped, and adorned with ribbon, bottle caps, fabric, and small plastic animals, odds and ends strewn, heaped, and hidden.

What stories do these scenes tell? A child building a fortress for all the animals ? A child figuring out how to tie a knot ? Two children coming together, for the first time, to make a potion ? A moment of frustration ? A quiet moment of relief ?

 

Something much deeper, many layered, and interconnected (place, child, materials, adults, theory, practice).

Play is sometimes messy, chaotic, and understood only partially by those involved and observing.

What can I learn about myself, my practice, and the children a part of the programs I am fortunate to be a part of (past and present) as I reflect on the residue I captured, reflect on what exists outside of the frame, and make connections to theory and dialogue with colleagues.

This blog is a means of thinking about play and deepening my practice, and maybe connecting with others who may have the same interests and questions.

Welcome!

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén